AMD Cayman
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

AMD Cayman - GPU MODEL
- Rate position;
- Core clock speed;
- Boost Clock;
AMD - Brand name;
- Maximum RAM amount;
- Memory clock speed;
- Memory bandwidth;
- Power consumption (TDP);
- Manufacturing process technology:

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M - GPU MODEL
933 - Rate position;
8 MHz - Core clock speed;
500 MHz - Boost Clock;
NVIDIA - Brand name;
512 MB - Maximum RAM amount;
1200 MHz - Memory clock speed;
38.4 GB/s - Memory bandwidth;
45 Watt - Power consumption (TDP);
90 nm - Manufacturing process technology:

VS

General Information

Let's compare video cards AMD Cayman vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M on basic information that will help you immediately determine which model is suitable in terms of cost (data are taken from public sources based on the analysis of the average cost of video cards in marketplaces Amazon, Ebay, Aliexpress). Comparing graphics cards can help you answer the following questions:
1) Which graphics card is better, AMD Cayman or AMD Cayman?
2) How to choose the right graphics card and what should I pay attention to?
3) How powerful is the graphics card and for what games is it suitable?
4) Can the video card be used in mining?
5) What scores did the video cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M get in benchmarks.
This is by no means a complete list of questions that you will learn the answers to. In the start description you will understand when the video card was manufactured, its place in the overall performance rating, the ratio of performance to cost, the code name of the graphics core and the name of its architecture. Also the segment of use, where and in what computers the video card can be installed. 

no data
Place in performance rating
1068
no data
Architecture
G7x (2005−2007)
no data
Code name
G71glm
no data
Release date
29 September 2005 (17 years old)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$99.99
no data
Price now
$126 (1.3x MSRP)
no data
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical Specifications Graphics Card

Comparing graphics cards AMD Cayman vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M in terms of technical specifications, which directly affect the final gaming, performance or mining performance. 
Dear visitors, in the technical specifications comparison block there is a preference highlighting (highlighted in yellow), so it will make it easier for you to study the advantages and disadvantages of the models 
What you need to pay attention to here:
1) GPU core starting clock speed and turbo mode.
2) The number of transistors, the more the better.
3) Thermal efficiency and the required TPD power. The higher the value, the more powerful power supply and motherboard will be needed.
4) The manufacturing process (lithography), indicated in nanometers, the smaller the value, the more advanced the graphics card.
Do not forget to study the comparison of video card test results in benchmarks, it will complement the overall picture of the analysis when reviewing the advantages and disadvantages.

no data
Core clock speed
8 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
500 MHz
no data
Manufacturing process technology
90 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
12.00
no data
CUDA cores per GPU
32
no data
Number of transistors
278 million

Dimensions and Compatibility

A comparison of video cards AMD Cayman vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M in terms of length, connection interface, as well as the number of required pins for power on the motherboard (power supply). 
If you are considering a new graphics card to upgrade your system, you should consider the following:
1) Measure the length of your existing graphics card; if it is shorter, you will have to buy an extra larger system case. This will be useful not only for the video card to fit there, but also for more efficient cooling of the system.
2) The number of power phases on the motherboard and power supply compatibility. High performance graphics cards require higher wattage power supplies and some of them need more pins to be connected to the motherboard. So make sure that your motherboard supports the video card.
This is all you need to know when analyzing a comparison between graphics cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M in connection interface and main dimensions.

no data
Interface
MXM-III
no data
Laptop size
large

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

Video memory comparison AMD Cayman vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M A very important model comparison unit, here you will understand which video card deserves your attention and which you can safely forget. In today's reality, new working applications, even games, are becoming more demanding on the hardware resources of the computer, where video memory is one of the important ones. The more memory of the video card, the faster the data is processed and less lag is observed when watching video, gaming, rendering. 
Which video card to choose by memory between AMD Cayman and {{video_card_name_2}?
1) Look at the GDDR type. The higher it is, the more modern and performant the model is.
2) How much memory is installed? The more memory, the faster multiple data sets will be handled.
3) Bandwidth. The higher the figure, the better.
4) Memory bus width. Similar to the fourth point.

As you can see, determining the winner of this comparison is not that difficult. You just need to compare the characteristics and decide in favor of the model with the best performance.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1200 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
38.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Port and Display Support

Port and display support for AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M may be different. When comparing models, it is important to determine what type of monitor and other external devices connection is provided, this is important for connecting not only multiple monitors, but also other accessories. 
For example, DisplayPort and HDMI differ drastically in the quality of the digital signal transmission, plus if you are looking to buy a new graphics card from these two models, it is important to consider which connector is available on your monitor, as you may need to buy a new cable or adapter DisplayPort > HDMI or vice versa.
When comparing AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M, choose the graphics card with the more modern HDMI port.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

A basic comparison of GPUs AMD Cayman and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M for different API versions. 
An API (Application Programming Interface) is a programming interface for interacting with various software.
This information will be useful if you:
1) Looking for a video card to develop applications or programs.
2) Looking for the best graphics card for a developer (universal solution).
3) Want to find the best graphics card for computer or mobile game development.
4) Looking for a graphics card for coding.
No matter what you are looking for you need a graphics card for, you should choose the one that is right for your price and you will find basic API support for developing applications and programs in any of them.

no data
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
no data
OpenGL
2.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
3.0
no data
OpenCL
N/A

Advantages of AMD Cayman

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

0.98% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Cayman or NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M .

AMD Cayman vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

Passmark GPU

As GPU inventory continues to grow, you may be wondering which GPU you should buy. We've compared them all in the Passmark GPU benchmark (yes... all current generation cards) to give you the definitive answer! Find out which graphics card is best for your gaming computer, find the answers to the important questions: - What's the best budget gaming graphics card? - What are the best cheap video cards? - What is the best gaming graphics card? The best video cards for gaming are presented in our ranking: checked with Passmark GPU.

Is the AMD Cayman better than NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

5.0 Out of User Rating
3.0 Out of User Rating