Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
598
no data
Value for money (0-100)
7.88
Gen. 5 Arrandale
Architecture
Kepler
no data
Code name
GK107
no data
Type
Desktop
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
5 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$99
no data
Price now
$137 (1.4x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.85
GMA HD
GPU code name
GK107
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
384
500 MHz
Core clock speed
902 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,270 million
45 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
28.86
no data
Floating-point performance
692.7 gflops
12
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Number of transistors
1,270 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
145 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

4.27% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 45 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or NVIDIA GeForce GT 640?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 640